<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Damon&apos;s Account</title>
      <link>http://damonwhite.com/account/</link>
      <description>The Accounting Of And By Damon White</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:20:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Who Am I...redux</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Being called a philosopher is closer to who I am than being an artist, because I do it more and I am able to do it in a lot more places. I do not need a canvas(or sketch pad), nor even write anything to do philosophy, because I can carry on a philosophical work in my converstations and reflections within upon my thoughts. Art requires a canvas to be completed, whereas a philosophical thought can be completed whether I jot it down or not.</p><p>This is why I am more apt to call myself a philosopher than an artist, because, I can do philosophy without doing my art, yet, I do not do my art without also doing philosophy.</p><p>Being a philosopher is more than simply informing another of how something works. We call those engineers. Nor is being a philosopher just being able to describe things. Such are poets. A philosopher is also not someone who conducts and observes experiements, such as a scientist; if done with thought, a pyschologist. Philosophers are not required to make thing easier to comprehend and understand, this is for teachers. And I can cover many more fields, yet, the point here is that a Philosopher can be a teacher, yet, few teaches are philosophers. A philosopher can be an engineer, yet, few engineers are philosophers. </p><p>Too often we call another a philosopher when they are actually a great teacher, or engineer, or even poet and not a philosopher at all. </p><p>Obviously this leads to the question of the philosopher and how such differs from other titles we hoist upon ourselves, yet, this entry concerns who I am...and who I am is a philosopher.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/who_am_iredux.html</link>
         <guid>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/who_am_iredux.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:20:35 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Fearsome Foursome...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed these 4 philosophers the most: Ludwig Wittgenstein, Jiddu Krishnamurti, Frederich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger. More for what they attempted to do philosophically than what they actually did.</p><p>Each felt they were at a junture of how we had once thought and ought to think in the future, and each made an attempt to think anew and provide a bridge to this new type of thinking on things. I am certain they did not demonstrate fully this new thinking(Ludwig came the closest, while Krishnamurti only did so when asked a question rfom the thinking of old); yet, it is this striving to &quot;perfect&quot; our thinking and not let ourselves carry on as before that impressed me most...their passion and fortitude to push philosophy toward something greater rather than offer another &nbsp;tangent which would dead end into irrelevance is a guiding principle that I keep in mind as I philosophy toward my philosophy.</p><p>How much I am influenced philosophically by any of these four as I do my philosophy remains to be deconstructed, yet, from the inside within me, I see huge differences in the overall picture, yet, similarities in the framework.</p><p>I also recognize that whenever I read the works of these four, I am able to access my own philosophical channel and hear my own thoughts come together philosophically, even if such does not harmonize much with what I just read. </p><p>In that way, these four challenge me to think beyond what I have been taught is me by my peers, society, even my own self, and for that, I am greatly appreciated of their work.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/the_fearsome_foursome.html</link>
         <guid>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/the_fearsome_foursome.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:29:06 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Accounting down to Who I Am...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>WHO AM I?</p><p>AN ARTIST? Unless I am engaging in an actual art project, I do not consider myself to be an artist. I realize that I will call myself an artist and smile along with others when they call me an artist, yet, only when I am doing the art do I truly feel&nbsp;I am earning that title.</p><p>And when I am doing the art, I do not stop to think and say to myself, now I am an artist. I am completely consumed by the art I am summoning forth...whereby the painting becomes an extention of my identity for that period of awarenss for me...I might say, I am this painting more so than declare myself as an artist.</p><p>My art, then, is a process of self-awareness...like the shaman who goes into a trance to see a vision, I do the same through color and design, forging unity based on logic...the vision I seek is a better vision for my awareness so that I may see within better of myself and the world around me.</p><p>Perhaps this is why the art that I do resonates as it does with others on a first glance and continues to do more so as they become aware of what the art depicts...a transition from an unknowing state&nbsp;to&nbsp;a knowing one, whereby we are gently pushed along by the most basic of symbolic forms of color and shapes to a greater self within...so, am I an artist? Not as I sit here and type this, yet, I am when I pick up my pencil and begin to sketch out the next painting all the way through to the last drop of paint on the canvas.</p><p>If you really want to know what&nbsp;I think as an artist, ask me when I am doing art...otherwise, you will get this, a journalist looking back on an event attempting to take a snapshot&nbsp;in time of what is passing by...damon</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/accounting_down_to_who_i_am.html</link>
         <guid>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/12/accounting_down_to_who_i_am.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:39:49 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Purpose for this Account</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The purpose&nbsp;for this Account is to set forth a record on the Philosophical Foundation for the Damontage. Rather than just a biographical rehash of influences, I am going to set out on an open sea and come ashore when I find&nbsp;a landing&nbsp;still interesting to me today no matter the amount of interest for me on past voyages.</p><p>At least that is the intent for now.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/09/the_purpose_for_this_account.html</link>
         <guid>http://damonwhite.com/account/2009/09/the_purpose_for_this_account.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:59:41 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>

